In a revelation that has sent shockwaves across the sports world, Stephen A. Smith has stepped into the spotlight once again—this time, to speak on what he claims is a deep and troubling issue within the WNBA surrounding Brittney Griner.
Known for his unfiltered takes and fearless approach to controversy, Smith did not hold back as he laid out a series of claims that could dramatically change how fans view the league.
The incident began during a recent broadcast when Smith was asked about the WNBA’s treatment of its star players, particularly Griner, who made headlines in 2022 after being detained overseas.
While most of the sports world rallied behind her during that time, Smith suggested there’s more to the story than the public has been told—and that some of it points directly back to the league’s own actions.

“What we’re talking about here is bigger than just one player,” Smith began, his tone measured but tense. “This is about what the WNBA chooses to protect and what it chooses to ignore. And I’m telling you—when the truth comes out, it’s going to raise a lot of uncomfortable questions.”
He went on to describe what he called a “culture of selective loyalty” within the organization—implying that while the league outwardly supports its players, behind closed doors, it prioritizes image and marketability over fairness and consistent treatment.
Without naming specific executives, Smith hinted that certain decisions made during Griner’s ordeal were not motivated solely by compassion or justice, but by optics and financial interest.
The statements quickly ignited a firestorm online. Social media erupted with fans and critics dissecting every word, with some praising Smith for “finally saying what needed to be said” and others accusing him of undermining a player who has already been through so much.
Griner herself has yet to comment publicly on Smith’s remarks, but those close to her have expressed frustration at what they see as the media using her name to generate controversy. However, others in the WNBA community admit that Smith’s comments touch on an issue that many have whispered about for years—the gap between the league’s public messaging and its internal politics.
Former players have started to weigh in as well. One ex-WNBA star, speaking anonymously, told reporters, “Look, I respect the league, but Stephen’s not pulling this out of thin air. If you’ve been inside, you know there are moments where the business side takes priority over the people. Brittney’s case just happened to be one of the most public examples.”

The WNBA has not released an official response to Smith’s allegations, though a league spokesperson reaffirmed its commitment to “supporting and uplifting every player.” Still, the silence on the specifics only seems to be fueling speculation that there may be more truth to Smith’s claims than the league is ready to admit.
Sports analysts are now questioning how this might affect the league’s credibility moving forward. The WNBA has worked tirelessly in recent years to grow its fan base, secure better pay for its athletes, and push for equality in sports—but if Smith’s revelations gain traction, it could lead to a serious public relations battle.
This is not the first time Stephen A. Smith has taken the WNBA to task. Over the years, he has frequently commented on issues of player pay, marketing, and treatment compared to male athletes. But this latest statement marks one of the most direct—and potentially damaging—criticisms yet, particularly because it involves a figure as high-profile and beloved as Brittney Griner.
For now, the sports world waits to see whether Smith will provide further details, whether the league will respond directly, and whether Griner herself will address the controversy. What’s clear is that the conversation he’s sparked is not going away anytime soon.
In an era where transparency and accountability are more important than ever, this could become a defining moment for the WNBA—and for its relationship with the athletes who make it what it is.