The mysterious and tragic de@th of political commentator Charlie Kirk has taken another shocking turn, and this time, it comes from one of the biggest names in media: Joe Rogan.
On a recent podcast, Rogan dropped a bombshell that has sent the internet into a frenzy, revealing that Candace Owens had tried to warn Charlie Kirk about his own wife, Erica Kirk, in the months leading up to his passing.
This revelation has not only intensified the scrutiny on the official investigation but has also painted a dark picture of ambition, betrayal, and a potential cover-up at the highest levels.
According to inside sources familiar with Rogan’s thinking, he has been conducting his own quiet investigation, and what he has uncovered is chilling. Rogan is said to believe that Erica Kirk may have been the root cause of the growing rift between Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk.
The theory suggests that Erica wanted more control over not just Charlie’s personal life, but also the major financial and strategic decisions at Turning Point USA.
The story goes that Candace, seeing this shift, attempted to warn her close friend that Erica was being influenced or manipulated, and that her ambition could pose a threat to the organization and to Charlie himself. Instead of heeding the warning, Charlie began to gradually distance himself from Candace, allegedly under Erica’s influence.
Not long after this fallout, the fateful event occurred, leaving a trail of unanswered questions. Rogan’s speculation has now placed Erica Kirk at the center of the storm, suggesting she knows far more than she has publicly shared.
This new information provides a powerful context for Candace Owens’ relentless one-woman crusade for the truth. Since Kirk’s passing, she has publicly and fiercely challenged the official narrative presented by law enforcement, particularly the FBI.
She has repeatedly questioned the speed with which investigators concluded that a man named Tyler Robinson was the sole perpetrator. Owens argues that critical evidence has been released in strategic, misleading doses, while other important details have been kept secret.
The official story—that Robinson was turned in by his own father and attempted to self-harm after his arrest—has been called a “fabrication” by Owens. She insists this narrative was scripted to manipulate public perception and close the case quickly.
“Tyler Robinson never intended to harm himself,” she wrote in a viral social media post. “The entire story that has been circulating in the media is fiction.”
Owens’ most explosive claim is that there is no hard evidence placing Tyler Robinson at the scene of the crime. “There is no video, no clear photo, just a blurry photo that his family insists is not him at all,” she declared. Her crusade has been to expose the holes in the investigation, insisting that the public is not being told the truth.
One of the most compelling pieces of her argument revolves around a video released by the FBI, which allegedly shows Tyler Robinson running across a rooftop shortly after the incident.
Owens has publicly dissected this footage, arguing that it is physically impossible for the person in the video to be Robinson. She revealed that Robinson suffers from a mild paralysis in his right leg, a medical fact that makes the fluid, rapid movement seen in the video impossible.
The FBI had previously explained the figure’s limp by suggesting he was concealing a weapon. Candace flatly rejected this. “No, that gait is not because he’s hiding anything,” she argued. “It’s because he’s had foot problems for years.
His family knows it, his friends know it, and the medical records prove it.” She claims to have inside information confirming that the Robinson family told federal agents the person in the video moved too fast to be their son.
This discrepancy has fueled theories that the video was either manipulated or features a different person entirely. Owens asserts that this is a classic example of investigators crafting a narrative to fit their suspect, rather than following the evidence.
“They show us one moment, the limp, and then they write a whole story around it,” she said. “But when the truth comes out, it doesn’t match up.”
As if that weren’t enough, Owens has also introduced the idea of a “mystery woman.” She claims that a witness sent the FBI a recording suggesting the shooter was not alone, and that a woman was seen assisting the suspect in leaving the scene.
Owens and her team later reviewed a now-deleted online video of the incident and, playing it frame by frame, claim to have heard a female voice in the background just as the suspect was moving away.
The silhouette of a person in a light-colored jacket was allegedly seen approaching the suspect, handing him something, and then leaving. “This is no longer speculation,” Owens concluded. “This is a clue, a part of the story that someone is deliberately erasing.”
The question of motive has also been a central theme. In a move that stunned the public, Candace released a private text message allegedly from Charlie Kirk, in which he expressed a desire to withdraw from the pro-Israel agenda, even turning down large donations to do so.
Staffers from Turning Point America reportedly confirmed the conversation was real, leading to a firestorm of speculation that Charlie may have been trying to pivot politically before his de@th, a move that could have angered powerful interests.
Joe Rogan’s revelations have tied all these threads together. His claim that Candace warned Charlie about Erica provides a personal, high-stakes dimension to the tragedy. It reframes the story from a random act of violence into a potential power struggle, where Erica’s quick ascent to CEO of Turning Point USA after her husband’s passing is now viewed with intense suspicion.
Her calm demeanor and swift forgiveness of the alleged perpetrator, which once seemed like grace, are now being questioned as something else entirely. The public is left to wonder: was Tyler Robinson just a scapegoat in a much larger, more sophisticated plot? As Candace Owens continues her fight, it’s clear the truth, whatever it may be, is far from being revealed.